Wednesday, July 11, 2012

Review: Laughing Dog Sneaky Pete Imperial IPA and Alpha Dog Imperial IPA

Time to finally dip into the Laughing Dog beers that finally arrived here in WV. Both brews received an 86 on Beer Advocate, which grants them the label of "good". Sneaky Pete weighs in at a whopping 10% ABV and 89 IBUs and Alpha Dog comes in at 8% ABV and 127 IBUs.

Commercial Descriptions:

"Sneaky Pete is a blend of five hop types: Simcoe, Glacier, Centennial, Vanguard and Hallertuaer, with Simcoe playing the dominate role at 30%. In addition, three separate malts were used: Honey Malt, Rye Malt, and Munich Malt. The brew has a copious aroma of white grapefruit, citrus overtones, a complex rich middle and long flavors in the finish; a real beauty. Finished with wild clover honey."

Alpha Dog: "A True Hop Bomb Brewed plenty of Columbus and Mt Hood Hops for a Piney hop character. Premium Pale, Honey and Munich Malt make this beer a little less malty but packing plenty of hop punch."


Laughing Dog Sneaky Pete Imperial IPA

Presentation: 12 oz bottle poured into a tulip.
Appearance: It has a very dark amber color with a small off white head. There was only a minimal amount of lacing. 

Aroma: Very fragrant pine, peach, and citrus notes. The citrus comprised mostly of grapefruit and orange aromas. There was also a noticeable amount of caramel malt in the background too. 

Taste: Orange and hop bitterness up front that slowly segues into pine and caramel malt. This is fairly bitter, but there is a pretty significant malt backbone to it too. It provides quite a bit of residual sweetness and bread-like character. This is definitely a sipper too. The spiciness of the alcohol is pretty apparent and it's incredibly warming. You can feel the alcohol burn slowly trickle down your chest after each sip. 

Mouthfeel: Boy this is much heavier than expected. It sure is thick for an IPA. There's a low amount of carbonation too, which doesn't help the texture much. 

Overall: This would be a spectacular IIPA if it wasn't for the extreme warming of the alcohol and the heavy body. It's as if Laughing Dog wants you to take a challenge with this beer. However, all things considered, this is a pretty enjoyable brew. The aroma is great and the taste is pretty solid. 

4/5
-Too much alcohol presence
-Heavy body


Laughing Dog Alpha Dog Imperial IPA
 Presentation: 22 oz bomber poured into a tulip.

Appearance: Light orange/yellow color with a big fluffy white head. The lacing on this is ridiculous. There's a beautiful film that sticks to the glass after each sip. 


Aroma: Plenty of pine and grassy notes upfront with a nice amount of grapefruit, orange, and sweet malt. This isn't incredibly complex, but it's good nonetheless.

Taste: Hops, pine, and bitterness up front. The hops and pine certainly hit you hard, but not quite as much as one would think from a beer at 127 IBUs. As it sits on your tongue you begin to notice the citrus (grapefruit and orange) and sweet malt. I looked at previous reviews of this beer and the biggest criticism that many had was that the malt backbone was too big on this. Honestly, it's not that big. It's really only noticeable with the sweetness and it compliments a faint honey note too. At 8.5% ABV the alcohol isn't that present. There's only a slightly warming character and it brings a minor spice character. This could have been a bit more complex, but it's pretty good as is. 

Mouthfeel: Medium body with a good amount of carbonation. This also finishes pretty dry. 

Overall: Not as sloppy as other reviews have hinted at. Yes, this is a pretty sweet IIPA, but it helps counteract the bitterness. Actually, this is a really enjoyable beer because of the sweetness. Personally, the biggest issue with huge IPAs is that they focus far too much on residual bitterness. It makes a beer one long droning note. This beer is not that. It has both bitterness and sweetness. Additionally, the appearance and lacing is great and the alcohol is well hidden. Other than more hop character, what else is there to be wanted in an imperial IPA?

4.5/5
-Could benefit from more hop presence and complexity

-Jeff

No comments:

Post a Comment